Jump to content


Frasca VRForum468Helicopter AcademyVOLO_VRHome200TigerTugs
Photo
- - - - -

Why aren't selection rates higher?


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 SwissK31

SwissK31

    VR Veteran Poster

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 68 posts

Posted 25 April 2019 - 19:16

As of April 2019, 30% of Army Aviators are eligible to retire, while 40% have more than 17 years service.  

 

It would seem to me that right now, selection rates would be near 100% if they want to tackle the approaching crisis. 

 

There must be some reason why rates have been about 50% the past 6 months.  

 

That begs the question:  What influences the selection rates the most?Because apparently high demand doesn't necessarily mean high selection.

 

I've looked over the forum and I haven't really found a clear answer.

 

I'm just curious.

 

 

Thanks!  

 

Currently, 30% of Army Aviators are eligible to retire, while 40% have more than 17 years service.  

 

It would seem to me that right now, selection rates would be near 100% if they want to tackle the approaching crisis.  

 


#2 StockTrader

StockTrader

    VR Veteran Poster

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 808 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Trucks, Baseball, Helicopters
  • Company working for:CW2, US Army, 64 Driver

Posted 25 April 2019 - 19:45

Think second and third order effects. There are only so many aircraft and IPs at Rucker to get everyone through. If they continually pick up 100% you will run into the bubbles again of the past with people waiting 8-12 months just to class up, maybe longer.
  • SwissK31 and actuallyalex like this

#3 Thedude

Thedude

    VR Veteran Poster

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 249 posts

Posted 25 April 2019 - 20:57

There also needs to be standards. The selection process is intended to weed out those who the board feels won’t be an asset to the Army and a 100% selection rate would completely negate that.

Where did you get those numbers from? They don’t match up with the composition of my company or battalion at all. No pilots in my company are eligible for retirement and less than half are over ten years total service. I can only think of a handful in the battalion that are eligible to retire or within a year or two of 20.
  • SwissK31 likes this

#4 jkray

jkray

    Student Poster

  • VR Member
  • PipPip
  • 13 posts
  • Gender:Male

Posted 26 April 2019 - 07:52

Think second and third order effects. There are only so many aircraft and IPs at Rucker to get everyone through. If they continually pick up 100% you will run into the bubbles again of the past with people waiting 8-12 months just to class up, maybe longer.

There also needs to be standards. The selection process is intended to weed out those who the board feels wont be an asset to the Army and a 100% selection rate would completely negate that.

After listening to the panel at the AAAA Summit, the reasons are very close to these answers. The panel said not many years ago they had 1 applicant for each available slot at flight school, this obviously doesnt make for recruiting the best pilots out there so they upped their game. They said that the goal is to have somewhere between 3-4 applicants per slot at flight school to make it an actually competitive process and to be able to bring on the best people to spend the money on training them. Right now it is about 2 to 2.5 applicants per slot which is why we are seeing the selection rates we are.
  • SwissK31 likes this

#5 SwissK31

SwissK31

    VR Veteran Poster

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 68 posts

Posted 26 April 2019 - 07:53

Got it from here.  Unless I read it wrong.  It technically says "Warrant Officer Crew Members".  

 

https://www.army.mil...ess_army_pilots



#6 XIIGage

XIIGage

    VR Veteran Poster

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 87 posts
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Orleans, LA

Posted 26 April 2019 - 12:20

After listening to the panel at the AAAA Summit, the reasons are very close to these answers. The panel said not many years ago they had 1 applicant for each available slot at flight school, this obviously doesnt make for recruiting the best pilots out there so they upped their game. They said that the goal is to have somewhere between 3-4 applicants per slot at flight school to make it an actually competitive process and to be able to bring on the best people to spend the money on training them. Right now it is about 2 to 2.5 applicants per slot which is why we are seeing the selection rates we are.

 

Yeah this is what I have heard too. 

 

The problem with lack of pilots is due to lack of the amount of applicants willing to come to the Army. In general the military has a hard time recruiting when the economy is doing well since a lot of civilian jobs are more preferable. It isn't as simple as just lowering standards to accept more of the available applicants.

 

As we have seen come up already, the Army is trying to find more ways to retain pilots or incentivize them.


  • SwissK31 likes this

#7 SwissK31

SwissK31

    VR Veteran Poster

  • Members
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 68 posts

Posted 26 April 2019 - 17:12

Completely agree that standards should not be dropped.

 

From personal experience, I was FQ-NS on the March board. My issue was that my PT was at about 243 and my essay needed revision.  I've raised PT to 283, but I digress.

 

My point is that maybe they should make clear PT standards for applicants to meet to even become Fully-Qualified.  If that were the case, I wouldn't have wasted my time and they wouldn't have wasted theirs.

 

Maybe even raise standards such as the SIFT to 50.  






0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users



FreeFlight_Home200HeliHelmets-VR HomeLakeSuperior200PrecisionVRForumHome200Genesys VR Forum 200Spectrum_VRHome200MaunaLoaVRHome200BLR 200