TomPPL Posted January 8, 2009 Posted January 8, 2009 Here's something interesting a friend sent me recently, has anyone else out there heard of it?http://www.challis-heliplane.com/v3/ Quote
heli.pilot Posted January 8, 2009 Posted January 8, 2009 (edited) I had heard the name before, but that was the first time I'd seen its design. Looks interesting with just the one wing! Having a single wing like that must have some CG implications. I would imagine that this would be cheaper than the X-2 design. Edited January 8, 2009 by heli.pilot Quote
coloheli Posted January 8, 2009 Posted January 8, 2009 That is way cool. What class would that be? Semi-fixed Rotory Wing Quote
charlicopter Posted January 8, 2009 Posted January 8, 2009 Hmmm.... I think it's a fun idea for RC... But for a full sized helicopter, how would you deal with the intense vibrations due to such intense and well-developed RBS? Can you believe the acceleration on that thing!? Quote
PhotoFlyer Posted January 9, 2009 Posted January 9, 2009 This design will not eliminate RBS, but it will delay RBS. Put simply, the faster the A/C flies the more lift the wings (or wing) will produce. That lift will permit a lower pitch angle on the main rotor, thus delaying RBS. If you designed this aircraft with enough wing to support the A/C fully (as a regular airplane does) then the only speed restraint would be that of a regular prop driven fixed wing aircraft. As it increased speed, more work would be taken away from the main rotor. Eventually it would be able to maintain a flat pitch (basically no lift) and RBS would be irrelevant. Quote
TomPPL Posted January 9, 2009 Author Posted January 9, 2009 Great reply there PhotoFlyer, thanks for posting..! Quote
PhotoFlyer Posted January 9, 2009 Posted January 9, 2009 Here is some more information about compound helicopters. It doesn't really talk about RBS, but it's some good information. Also look at the AH-56 Cheyenne. Quote
Hella Copter Posted January 13, 2009 Posted January 13, 2009 It would be cooler if it were coaxial and they ditch the gimpy wing on the side. That wing must make for an inefficient hover. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.