Jump to content
Paco

Optionally-Manned Little Bird

Recommended Posts

Any discussion or mention of unmanned helicopters should be banned from this site :D Furthermore..... an unmanned 500, 530 or anything that remotely resembles one is just sacrilegious and is against nature !

Edited by Flying Pig
  • Like 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Where's the "dislike" button.

Edited by gary-mike

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I remember seeing that a while ago when they were still teaching it how to hover and recognize boxes as buildings, avoid them, land on them, you name it.

 

It's pretty cool.

 

Buuuuuttt......I'm pretty sure that's how everyone felt about SkyNet when they started building robots.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Any discussion or mention of unmanned helicopters should be banned from this site :D Furthermore..... an unmanned 500, 530 or anything that remotely resembles one is just sacrilegious and is against nature !

I agree wholeheartedly.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

At this point unmanned helicopters are like gas powered butter knives. They have created a product to fill a need that nobody actually needs.

 

The military is quite proud of its unmanned drone that can air drop pallets of water and will tell you how safe it is. Thing is, that job was never dangerous to begin with. And a pilot still has to start it Make a helicopter that can do a dust landing at night to a hot LZ marked by a chemlight and they can save pilots lives. But they can't do that.

 

The only job I can see this helicopter being useful for is doing something like flying tours on predetermined routes and known landing areas. So I guess if a tour company decides to buy a helicopter that costs 50 million dollars we'll all be in trouble.

 

Maybe one day this technology will become useful, but I'm pretty sure it's a ways off.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Fortunately, a lot of helicopter operations involve taking PEOPLE places. I think we are at least a generation (if not more) away from people getting on a robot. Who knows maybe not.....Maybe some naive people will. Personally, I want a pilot/crew who is as equally vested in the outcome of a successful flight as I am. Not some engineer sitting in an office hitting "CNTRL -ALT- DELETE" as fast as he can while I plummet to the ground 2000 miles away.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...