Joe Blow Posted November 6, 2012 Report Share Posted November 6, 2012 (edited) After hearing different pilots having different opinions on this discussion. Thought I'd see what VR has to say. A R44II is scheduled to take off from an airport only 130' above Sea level. It'll be landing in a confined area that is also give or take a couple feet 130' above sea level. OAT reading 30C. Pilot: 180Passenger: 220Aft left: 140Aft right: 22020gal of fuel. Total Flight to and from confined is projected to take no longer than 30 minutes. Take off weight 2300lbsMax gross is 2500lbs CG is in the envelope, we are 200lbs below max gross, do we have enough power for a confined? How would you fly the approach? What is to be considered with such forward CG, while approaching a confined? Edited November 7, 2012 by Joe Blow Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nightsta1ker Posted November 6, 2012 Report Share Posted November 6, 2012 (edited) There are many other factors that need to be considered here. How 'confined' is the confined area? Height of obstacles? Can you OGE hover at that DA/weight? What are the other weather conditions? An experienced pilot could probably find a way to make it work, or know enough to not try it. The real question is, how far do you want to push it? I probably wouldnt go if I was sitting close to the edge of any envelope, however, that doesnt mean it cant be done. another thing to consider is: Getting into a confined can also be a lot easier than getting back out again. The school I did my commercial/CFI at lost an R44 a few years back. All 4 perished because the pilot couldn't clear the trees coming out of a confined at a high DA near max gross. Edited November 6, 2012 by nightsta1ker Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Blow Posted November 6, 2012 Author Report Share Posted November 6, 2012 How 'confined' is the confined area? Height of obstacles? Can you OGE hover at that DA/weight? What are the other weather conditions? Its about 100ftx100ft. Trees are 100ft all around. Yes you can hover OGE according to the chart. No wind. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SBuzzkill Posted November 6, 2012 Report Share Posted November 6, 2012 (edited) OK, how much power to I have left in that OGE hover? Am I close to max power or do I have quite a bit to play with? Can you post up the performance planning graphics or at least the numbers? Edited November 6, 2012 by SBuzzkill Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flying Pig Posted November 6, 2012 Report Share Posted November 6, 2012 (edited) My question.... Is this just a hypothetical or are you doing this for real and putting lives in the hands of a bunch of anonymous people on the internet? If its the latter... I say its impossible and dont even attempt it. If you absolutely positively have to get there.... drive. Edited November 6, 2012 by Flying Pig Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R22139RJ Posted November 7, 2012 Report Share Posted November 7, 2012 I'm with flying pig on this one. Can you still log the time when the forums are acting as PIC and making decisions for you? I think the fact that you posted this means you shouldn't do the flight. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nightsta1ker Posted November 7, 2012 Report Share Posted November 7, 2012 Well, let's slow down here and not eviscerate the guy. I think one of the reasons he's posting is because some experienced pilots he knows have already had a disagreement about this. My advice: When you have two experienced pilots arguing about what can/can't or should/should not be done with a helicopter, always follow the lead of the more conservative pilot. You both may outlive the other guy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Joe Blow Posted November 7, 2012 Author Report Share Posted November 7, 2012 OK, how much power to I have left in that OGE hover? Am I close to max power or do I have quite a bit to play with? Can you post up the performance planning graphics or at least the numbers? Posted OGE hover chart in first post. We'll say you have an inch to play with.. The senario is fake fellas. I've heard some interesting answers. So I thought I'd post it on VR. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apiaguy Posted November 7, 2012 Report Share Posted November 7, 2012 don't see a real problem here... inside the envelope... no problem. Hover performance to boot...How to fly... approach area... hover over 100x100.. very slowly descend. The forward CG is really a non issue if it is inside the envelop... lets bash Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
superstallion6113 Posted November 7, 2012 Report Share Posted November 7, 2012 (edited) I would say absolutely not. Why? Because when you run the calculations with zero fuel, the W&B is out of limits, CG being too far forward. Heck it's so close, you probably wouldn't have to burn much fuel before the CG shifts far enough forward to be out of limits. A 30 min flight could push it out of limits. I checked those calculations on 4 of the R44s my school flies, and they are in limits, barely, at 20 gal, but are out of limits at 15 gal. That's really close. Putting both 220lb passengers in the rear seats makes it look a little bit better. Edited November 7, 2012 by superstallion6113 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goldy Posted November 7, 2012 Report Share Posted November 7, 2012 I agree with ApiaGuy, but yes, the bigger guys need to be in back (Largest behind the pilot). Remember it is always easier to get in than to get out. Powerchecks in the hover, and OGE before you take off will let you know what to expect before you commit. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eagle5 Posted November 7, 2012 Report Share Posted November 7, 2012 I would say absolutely not. Why? Because when you run the calculations with zero fuel, the W&B is out of limits, CG being too far forward. Heck it's so close, you probably wouldn't have to burn much fuel before the CG shifts far enough forward to be out of limits. A 30 min flight could push it out of limits. I checked those calculations on 4 of the R44s my school flies, and they are in limits, barely, at 20 gal, but are out of limits at 15 gal. That's really close. Putting both 220lb passengers in the rear seats makes it look a little bit better. I'm with this guy. If you're outside the envelope with zero fuel (and especially at just 5 gallons less than takeoff), DON'T GO! What if something unexpected happens and the flight takes longer, and you thusly burn off too much gas and end up over the line? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric Hunt Posted November 7, 2012 Report Share Posted November 7, 2012 The aircraft must be within CG at zero fuel and at takeoff fuel and at all times in between. Put the fat dude in the back. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
d10 Posted November 7, 2012 Report Share Posted November 7, 2012 The R-44 POH states at the beginning of Chapter 6: "The helicopter must be flown only within the weight and balance limitations specified in Section 2." It also goes on to caution "Fuel is located aft of helicopter CG, causing CG to move forward during flight. Always determine safe loading with empty fuel as well as with takeoff fuel." Operating outside of these limits would be a violation of FAR 91.9 ("no person may operate a civil aircraft without complying with the operating limitations specified in the approved Airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual"). If the fuel burn will take the CG out of limits, you can't do the flight as planned. It's not a matter of opinion. It doesn't look like the weight will stop you from conducting the approach but there are aircraft limitations and there are pilot limitations. You need to be aware of both. 100'x100' doesn't sound too difficult for a ~40' aircraft but it might be for some pilots. You said no wind, but that can easily change in flight, and any kind of wind from any direction is going to increase your power requirements for this approach. If this approach was reaching the edge of a pilot's limitation with no wind, it might be exceeded when you consider that. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nightsta1ker Posted November 7, 2012 Report Share Posted November 7, 2012 The R-44 POH states at the beginning of Chapter 6: "The helicopter must be flown only within the weight and balance limitations specified in Section 2." It also goes on to caution "Fuel is located aft of helicopter CG, causing CG to move forward during flight. Always determine safe loading with empty fuel as well as with takeoff fuel." Operating outside of these limits would be a violation of FAR 91.9 ("no person may operate a civil aircraft without complying with the operating limitations specified in the approved Airplane or Rotorcraft Flight Manual"). If the fuel burn will take the CG out of limits, you can't do the flight as planned. It's not a matter of opinion. It doesn't look like the weight will stop you from conducting the approach but there are aircraft limitations and there are pilot limitations. You need to be aware of both. 100'x100' doesn't sound too difficult for a ~40' aircraft but it might be for some pilots. You said no wind, but that can easily change in flight, and any kind of wind from any direction is going to increase your power requirements for this approach. If this approach was reaching the edge of a pilot's limitation with no wind, it might be exceeded when you consider that. I'm sorry, but how is wind going to increase the power requirements? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
d10 Posted November 7, 2012 Report Share Posted November 7, 2012 There's no approach path to a 100'x100' LZ surrounded by 100' obstacles that won't put you into downdrafts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nightsta1ker Posted November 7, 2012 Report Share Posted November 7, 2012 There's no approach path to a 100'x100' LZ surrounded by 100' obstacles that won't put you into downdrafts. Never thought of it that way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eagle5 Posted November 7, 2012 Report Share Posted November 7, 2012 (edited) There's no approach path to a 100'x100' LZ surrounded by 100' obstacles that won't put you into downdrafts. So, we're talking about a completely vertical (and really slow) descent from just over 100' in an R44 (followed then by a completely vertical max takeoff to just over 100'),...sounds like fun! Edited November 7, 2012 by eagle5 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
d10 Posted November 8, 2012 Report Share Posted November 8, 2012 To be fair, a 60 degree approach angle would clear you by a couple feet at each end. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.