Jump to content

never thought about this

Guest pokey

Recommended Posts

Text converted for OP, and any other thread readers...




As aircraft maintenance providers, we are often called on by our customers to evaluate an aircraft relative to its condition and compliance prior to the purchase of that aircraft.
The evaluation consists of a visual inspection of certain areas of the aircraft and a functional or operational inspection of certain systems. Additionally, the maintenance records are reviewed to confirm the aircraft is being operated in accordance with its maintenance program with respect to Chapter 5 Inspections, Chapter 4 Airworthiness Requirements and Airworthiness Directives. Some customers even elect to perform a compliance review of the Service Bulletins that are applicable to the aircraft.
As the evaluation is performed, we inevitably uncover discrepancies that may or may not be an unairworthy condition. And of course that puts us right in the middle of the dispute between buyer and seller about what is airworthy and what is not. But thatís a subject for a future post.
What we do find ourselves in, however, is the dilemma of whether a pre-purchase evaluation is considered a 14 CFR 43.9 event or a 14 CFR 43.11 event. In other words are we approving the aircraft for return to service with respect to work performed (43.9) or are we approving the aircraft for return to service and certifying its airworthiness (43.11)?
If we do uncover an unairworthy condition and the customer elects not to correct that condition do we make a maintenance record entry only for the work we did perform (43.9) or do we make a maintenance record entry that records the pre-purchase and states that a list of open discrepancies has been provided to the owner/operator (43.11)?
One answer is that a pre-purchase evaluation is not an inspection required by 14 CFR part 91 and therefore 43.11 does not apply. But then, 43.11 does state that it applies to any inspection performed ìin accordance withî part 91 not ìrequiredî by part 91.
Finally, when you look at the definition of Maintenance in 14 CFR part 1, it includes inspection. So therefore, even if the pre-purchase performed is not an inspection that has anything to do with part 91, it is still an inspection and 14 CFR 91.407(a)(2) does require a maintenance record entry required by 43.9 or 43.11, as applicable.
What Say You??
i did NOT write this, so take it easy on me, but? i have never really thought about it either & have done many pre-buy inspections, and never put it in the logbook, just a letter to the owner/ and buyer----i guess that could be considered a logbook entry tho, altho i never stated if the aircraft was airworthy or not.



You'll Thank me later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


  • Create New...