Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hey guys, just wanted to ask your opinions on what single thing defines a difference between a Precision and NP Approach. I'm going with.... Precision has a DA / DH and NP has an MDA. Anyone agree with this?

Posted

Lateral, vertical and distance guidance to an altitude you dont' have to level off at.

The old ILS had a marker system to tell you your distance from dh(da).

The newer ILS/DME and even newer GPS WAAS gives continuous distance guidance.

Posted (edited)

A precision approach has glideslope guidance.

 

From FAR 1:

 

Precision approach procedure means a standard instrument approach procedure in which an electronic glide slope is provided, such as ILS and PAR.

Edited by Gomer Pylot
Posted

+1 Gomer Pylot,

 

Precision approach has vertical guidance and hence a Decision Altitude, Non-Precision does not have vertical guidance and hence a Minimum Descent Altitude.

Posted

+2 to the definition provided by GP. Emphasis on the electronic glidepath is provided. For example a VNAV approach in which your glidepath is created by your nav system is NOT considered a precision approach even though it is effectively flown the same way.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...