Creep0321 Posted December 14, 2015 Report Share Posted December 14, 2015 For warrants: 4 64d, 2 64e, 1 ch47, 0 c-12, 8 60m. For lt: 3 64d, 2 64e, 1 c-12, 2 ch47, 5 60m. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StockTrader Posted December 14, 2015 Report Share Posted December 14, 2015 For warrants: 4 64d, 2 64e, 1 ch47, 0 c-12, 8 60m. For lt: 3 64d, 2 64e, 1 c-12, 2 ch47, 5 60m.Now those are some good spreads 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cofranc Posted December 14, 2015 Report Share Posted December 14, 2015 For warrants: 4 64d, 2 64e, 1 ch47, 0 c-12, 8 60m. For lt: 3 64d, 2 64e, 1 c-12, 2 ch47, 5 60m.Sorry for my ignorance, but what does "It" represent? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creep0321 Posted December 14, 2015 Report Share Posted December 14, 2015 Sorry for my ignorance, but what does "It" represent?Lieutenant Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yamer Posted December 14, 2015 Report Share Posted December 14, 2015 Sorry for my ignorance, but what does "It" represent?lost 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drew Posted December 14, 2015 Report Share Posted December 14, 2015 I wish every selection looked like that! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tradewinds Posted December 14, 2015 Report Share Posted December 14, 2015 lost Just wondering, were you selected for WOFT as a civilian? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Luofynerd Posted December 14, 2015 Report Share Posted December 14, 2015 For warrants: 4 64d, 2 64e, 1 ch47, 0 c-12, 8 60m. For lt: 3 64d, 2 64e, 1 c-12, 2 ch47, 5 60m.How did they go? 47 first? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yamer Posted December 14, 2015 Report Share Posted December 14, 2015 Just wondering, were you selected for WOFT as a civilian?No Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creep0321 Posted December 14, 2015 Report Share Posted December 14, 2015 How did they go? 47 first?Actually no, warrants had a 64e go first than the 47. LT's had he C-12 go first, then I think a 60, 47's were like 3rd and 5th I want to say, but could be wrong. 60s were left for the bottom oml of warrants and 64s were left for bottom oml LT's. Next time I'll bring a notepad and write the order. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MichaelRyanSD Posted December 15, 2015 Report Share Posted December 15, 2015 Dang, I saw a lot of smiling people today, with a selection like that, now I know why. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akscott60 Posted December 15, 2015 Report Share Posted December 15, 2015 Great spread at selection. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CharyouTree Posted December 15, 2015 Report Share Posted December 15, 2015 Do people ever take the 64D before the 64E? If so...why? Duty stations? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yamer Posted December 15, 2015 Report Share Posted December 15, 2015 Just wondering, were you selected for WOFT as a civilian?Why do you ask? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rrhoads17 Posted January 6, 2016 Report Share Posted January 6, 2016 Anyone know what did the most recent selection looked like? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creep0321 Posted January 6, 2016 Report Share Posted January 6, 2016 For warrants: 4 64d, 2 64e, 1 ch47, 0 c-12, 8 60m. For lt: 3 64d, 2 64e, 1 c-12, 2 ch47, 5 60m. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Creep0321 Posted January 11, 2016 Report Share Posted January 11, 2016 From this morning: Warrants: 3 64d, 2 64e, 2 C-12, 1 47, 11 60mLT's: 2 64d, 1 64e, 0 C-12, 1 47, 6 60m Order:Warrants: 47, c12, 60, 64e, 64e, c12, 8 60's, 3 64d's, last 2 got 60'sLT's: 64e, 47, 5 60's, 64d, 60, 64d 4 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rrhoads17 Posted January 11, 2016 Report Share Posted January 11, 2016 When will those C-12's disappear from selection?!?! Lol Also, why is it that apaches seem to be always chosen last or almost last? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drew Posted January 11, 2016 Report Share Posted January 11, 2016 They said in selection, pretty much, that the C12s are pretty much going to disappear as an option for a while. They actually took several people that had already selected C12 and were in the 60M course and told them they were staying 60M pilots and they took several that were in the 60AL and told them they would continue to 60M and would stay 60 drivers. Pretty crazy. HRC decided they had an over load of C12 pilots all of the sudden. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drew Posted January 11, 2016 Report Share Posted January 11, 2016 And for the 64s. It is really class dependent. This class for the most part really wanted 60s. Another class might be all about the 64. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaydenp Posted January 11, 2016 Report Share Posted January 11, 2016 I heard that the reasoning behind the C-12 pulls is because of the switch to the Lakotas, I was told (and don't quote me on this) that the army is looking to pull c-12 pilots only from the Lakota pipeline, and the reasoning is because you won't have to send a student to the Blackhawk course because they would already have officially qualified on an advanced aircraft coming from the Lakota course which means less money and time being spent on that student sending them straight to fixed wing directly after the Lakota course. So essentially they are saving those spots for the five Lakota class that will graduate this fiscal year. It makes sense to me, but hey could just be a rumor. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yamer Posted January 12, 2016 Report Share Posted January 12, 2016 Last time I heard, the Lakota doesn't qualify as an aircraft qualification because it's not a deployable airframe. It's only an add on. Meaning 60s then C-12 per army standards. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaydenp Posted January 12, 2016 Report Share Posted January 12, 2016 I understand what you mean but I think you are getting rated and qualified in an aircraft mixed up, the army doesn't consider students rated in the uh72 because they haven't gone through to the advanced portion of the training but are indeed qualified in that aircraft after completing ierw, and although it's not deployable it is considered an advanced aircraft along with the Blackhawk, apache, etc., at least according to the army which fills that void allowing students to go straight to the fixed wing course right out of the Lakota course Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
magnus017 Posted January 12, 2016 Report Share Posted January 12, 2016 I think I speak for anyone here who picked c-12's. I would be extremely aggravated if they changed my aircraft designation after my selection. Is there any confirmation that this could/did happen? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yamer Posted January 12, 2016 Report Share Posted January 12, 2016 Unless something changed, whether we use rated or qualified doesn't matter, once you're complete with Primary/instruments/BWS you aren't rated or qualified in ANY aircraft because you haven't completed the entire course for that aircraft (nights, goggles, tactics, sling loads, whatever). Whether you're a 72 student or 58/67 student, same result. Are you saying that fixed wing for life doesn't have to have a rotorcraft cert anymore and are going straight from primary to c12 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.