PhotoFlyer Posted December 11, 2007 Posted December 11, 2007 http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief.asp?ev_id=2...01772&key=1 I think everybody should see this, and learn from it. Accidents like this are completely preventable. Comments, please post. Quote
FlyNHighNFast Posted December 11, 2007 Posted December 11, 2007 I don't get it. The pilot's job is to fly the aircraft, everything else should be secondary. He could have completed a normal pattern and landed into the wind, instead of downwind. A stuck mike is not an emergency, just turn the radio off and squawk 7600. Quote
joker Posted December 11, 2007 Posted December 11, 2007 The stuck mic didn't cause this accident. It might have been part of the 'error chain', but to say the crash was 'due to the stuck mic' is a bit sensationalist, eh? Aviate, Navigate Communicate! Joker Quote
Goldy Posted December 11, 2007 Posted December 11, 2007 ok, I start by saying I have never flown a 407..even in my dreams. But that must have been one hell of a tail wind Quote
PhotoFlyer Posted December 11, 2007 Author Posted December 11, 2007 The stuck mic didn't cause this accident. It might have been part of the 'error chain', but to say the crash was 'due to the stuck mic' is a bit sensationalist, eh? Aviate, Navigate Communicate! Joker Very right, poor decision making caused the accident. I used that title to draw attention to the topic because I believe there is a lot to be learned from this accident. It is a classic example of a pilot taking a minor problem and turning it into an emergency. Quote
nbit Posted December 11, 2007 Posted December 11, 2007 Yeah, it was a few years ago I remember about a Bonanza had it's door pop open on takeoff and the plane subsequently crashed into a house, killing the pilot and causing havoc on the ground. (I believe it may have killed or injured a home inhabitant. Someone else here may have heard). The reason cited was that the pilot lost control of the aircraft trying to take care of the door issue. I couldn't understand how though - cause I used to own a Bonanza, with a very tight door seal, and it too had once popped open in flight, but never became a problem, other than I just had to turn back, land and have the passenger close the door and double check the latching mechanisms. The little decisions in how to approach a small problem can lead up to large consequences. Aviate, navigate, communicate. How true... Quote
AdminLB Posted December 11, 2007 Posted December 11, 2007 The 407 has excellent power to weight ratio. Should not have happened. Must of been fat on gas, fat on pax (only 3 onboard?/), fat on sink rate, and fat on tailwind. All that + poor decision making + poor pilot technique = Settling with power. Had nothing to do with stuck mic. Wonder what the purpose of the flight was? I did not look up N407LL to try and get an idea. Lyn Quote
Linc Posted December 11, 2007 Posted December 11, 2007 Lyn, Nonscheduled 14 CFR Part 135: Air Taxi & Commuter From the header of the report. Quote
helonorth Posted December 11, 2007 Posted December 11, 2007 The pilot probably did that approach a thousand times and finally got into vortex ring state. Do notsquak 7600. If your in the pattern, fly it and look for signals or go somewhere and make a phonecall. I was told by MSP ATC that 7600 should only be used on an instrument plan. Quote
Paisley Posted December 11, 2007 Posted December 11, 2007 Everybody always seems to blame the wind. Quote
AdminLB Posted December 11, 2007 Posted December 11, 2007 Lyn,From the header of the report. Thanks, I saw that. Many mission types can be done under 135. I was just wondering what the nature of the mission was. Perhaps just a charter flight hauling people from point A to point B. Maybe an ENG ship. It appears that the owner of the helicopter is FCC EQUIPMENT FINANCING INC located in Jacksonville FL. That really does not tell us much though. Lyn Quote
JDHelicopterPilot Posted December 11, 2007 Posted December 11, 2007 A great example of something so simple turning into a major issue. Above poster said 7600 is for IFR flight plans. Not true, it is used for VFR or IFR radio failure. The tower would have no idea if your radio failed if you didn't SQ 7600. I have had 2 radio failures in both cases able to recieve but not TX. Both times I was off shore. One time I used to transponder to reply by using the IDENT feature as requested by ATC. The other time I had light signals. I wonder if the fact the 407 pilot put the helicopter in a slip to decrease ground speed contributed to the problem. A slip would reduce A/S and increase rate of decent. Not a good thing with a tail wind. JD Quote
helonorth Posted December 11, 2007 Posted December 11, 2007 A great example of something so simple turning into a major issue. Above poster said 7600 is for IFR flight plans. Not true, it is used for VFR or IFR radio failure. The tower would have no idea if your radio failed if you didn't SQ 7600. I have had 2 radio failures in both cases able to recieve but not TX. Both times I was off shore. One time I used to transponder to reply by using the IDENT feature as requested by ATC. The other time I had light signals. I wonder if the fact the 407 pilot put the helicopter in a slip to decrease ground speed contributed to the problem. A slip would reduce A/S and increase rate of decent. Not a good thing with a tail wind. JDI am aware it is for both IFR and VFR. It was for a specific airspace underlying class Bravo. Thehead controller asked us not to squawk lost com because it seemed unnecessary and causedproblems. Enter the pattern and look for signals. You were talking to ATC offshore? Quote
JDHelicopterPilot Posted December 12, 2007 Posted December 12, 2007 I am aware it is for both IFR and VFR. It was for a specific airspace underlying class Bravo. Thehead controller asked us not to squawk lost com because it seemed unnecessary and causedproblems. Enter the pattern and look for signals. You were talking to ATC offshore? I see. I too have found sometimes local controlers like to do things "their way" rather than as said in the FAR/AIM. Sometimes it makes sense. I just wonder how MSP controlers know when a radio failed w/o seeing 7600? Maybe in the pattern it works but I never lost a radio in the pattern. I wasn't off shore in the Gulf. Noticed radio failed, turned back around flew back to shore, 7600 and landed. Quote
brushfire21 Posted December 13, 2007 Posted December 13, 2007 ok, I start by saying I have never flown a 407..even in my dreams. But that must have been one hell of a tail wind Goldy, we "flew" a close cousin to the 407 last year on a miserable hot afternoon in a sim if you can remember that far back! Also as I recall, we both had the oppurtunity to auger it in a few times too I might add!!! Me thinks that all your R22/44 time lately has made you forget what a real cyclic feels like hahaha We did a damn good job of aviating and navigating too....... might I add! Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.