doanut99 Posted March 17, 2007 Posted March 17, 2007 Hey all!! New member here, but longtime lurker. Im about to start my training with Helicopter Services in Houston,TX in may with my buddy TheLorax (member name). We went and took a demo flight a few weeks ago and they even let me try the controls a little, which hooked me for good. My question is, has anyone ever worked for National Geographic? Maybe flying film crews into remote locations or on documentary filming? I hope to work my way up to one of these types of jobs. Maybe not for that specific company, but something involving wildlife for sure. Any help or comments are very appreciated. Thank you, -ryan Quote
TheLorax Posted March 18, 2007 Posted March 18, 2007 very interesting thread. i too am also curious. i guess this would fall into the category of photo flying? im not too sure. but the option to go to remote areas and get paid to do something as exciting as that beckons me. Quote
doanut99 Posted March 18, 2007 Author Posted March 18, 2007 Whats goin on Ian? Thanks for stopping by. Im curious to see what we get as far as answers. Quote
clay Posted March 19, 2007 Posted March 19, 2007 a guy i know here in the houston area did some flying for national georgraphic here around the houston ship channel and texas city area. . . Quote
doanut99 Posted March 19, 2007 Author Posted March 19, 2007 hmmm, what would that be considered? Photo flying? Quote
AndrewT Posted March 19, 2007 Posted March 19, 2007 Though I have no affiliation or knowledge of National Geographic operations, I would think that they would contract their photo work out to operators in whatever area they are doing an article on Quote
cctk2 Posted March 19, 2007 Posted March 19, 2007 true, makes senseOver the years Ive done a couple charters flying NatGeo photographers. They are amonst some of the most difficult and demanding professionals Ive had to fly. Challanging yes, but they know not what we can do nor what we cant, which is typically of no consequence to them. Enjoyable, yes, just be ready for a potentially trying client.Chip Quote
doanut99 Posted March 19, 2007 Author Posted March 19, 2007 You know Chip, for some reason that doesn't suprise me. Thanks for the the help all. So im getting that they don't employ their own pilots, just charter out the local help. Which would make sense. Quote
Gomer Pylot Posted March 19, 2007 Posted March 19, 2007 Flying photographers is the most dangerous flying I've ever done with nobody shooting at me. You have to be very careful, and very disciplined. They always want lower and slower, or something even more dangerous. You must leave the ego behind and have the guts to tell them you can't do that, and refuse anything out of the ordinary. They will request the most idiotic things, and it's up to you to say no. There are many piles of bent metal which resulted from pilots being too inexperienced to just say no. Organizations like National Geographic don't employ pilots, they charter aircraft from Part 135 operators when they need them. Same for wildlife organizations. Quote
doanut99 Posted March 19, 2007 Author Posted March 19, 2007 Thanks Gomer, you cleared that up in a hot second. I guess I could settle for tuna spotting.....or maybe have to up and move to Africa. Sweet. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.