Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

This is kindof a silly question. I know in some flight communities pilots of one type of aircraft are viewed differently than others. Is the same true for Army aviation? What stereotypes are out there for pilots of different types of Army aircraft? I haven't heard any is why I'm wondering. Just curious.

Edited by IWannaFly
Posted

Yes, yes there are... instead of possibly upsetting others in other airframes I will just talk about hookers (Chinook pilots)

 

 

Typically laid back, fun loving people.

 

 

 

CHAD

Posted
This is kindof a silly question. I know in some flight communities pilots of one type of aircraft are viewed differently than others. Is the same true for Army aviation? What stereotypes are out there for pilots of different types of Army aircraft? I haven't heard any is why I'm wondering. Just curious.

 

Hookers = bus drivers, skilled bus drivers, but bus drivers nonetheless.

The difference between a Hoover and a gunship? A Hoover only has one dirt bag in it. And, contrary to what gunship pilots believe- you can't solve ALL your problems in life with a pair of rockets. You CAN silence almost all your problems in life with a WELL AIMED pair of rockets, however.

Blackhawk drivers never solo.

Scouts go looking for trouble. From the burning scout, adjust your fire... A death wish isn't required for scouts, but it is helpful.

It's not polite, or smart, to speak ill of medevac pilots. There, but for the grace of God, go you...

 

Army aviators are all arrogant prima donna punk-ass kids. They're not real soldiers at all. The legs, cannon cockers, etc., all of'em hate, fear, envy and mistrust what they don't understand- aviation. Until the rounds start popping through the brush, or the T-whatevers are coming across the line, or you drop into the LZ with hot chow or a ride home...

Posted
Fair enough. :)

 

Heh...do they still give that speech in scout training about the study that looked at the survival time of different MOS's time in contact with the enemy and scouts having the shortest at 3 seconds?

Posted
Heh...do they still give that speech in scout training about the study that looked at the survival time of different MOS's time in contact with the enemy and scouts having the shortest at 3 seconds?

 

Hey, I remember that one - although we were given 16 seconds back in 1988. :rolleyes:

  • 1 month later...
Posted
Heh...do they still give that speech in scout training about the study that looked at the survival time of different MOS's time in contact with the enemy and scouts having the shortest at 3 seconds?

They said the same thing to the 13-F's that I went through Sill with back in the day (1988 to be precise).

 

;-)

 

13-F = artillery forward observer

  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...