Black Bear Posted October 1, 2013 Posted October 1, 2013 I like some of us, have some serious concerns about the use of drones in our airspace. What follows is a prime example why I feel the way I do. I live within a stones throw from Staunton State park here in Colorado. It is important to note, that the park is surrounded on three sides by residential developments. The park is in the foothills west of Denver with an elevation of 8-10000 MSL Yesterday, I watched from my deck as St. Anthony's Flight for Life (AS350b3) performed a recon for an LZ after being called to assist in the rescue of a fallen climber. He spent about 15 minutes flying over the area at about 200-300 ft AGL (depending on terrain) before finally landing in the park. The rescue was completed successfully. Now, here is where it gets interesting. Today, on a local forum, a resident posted a request for help from the community in locating and returning his lost, very expensive drone. The person stated that he lost it somewhere in the area of Staunton park while he was flying it over his neighborhood which is located on the eastern border of the park. He doesn't mention when he lost it, but that is not the point. The point is, he was flying an unknown sized drone, lost control of said drone which could have ended up anywhere. I can't help but think of FFL crew and the unknown danger that they possible faced yesterday, if in fact that is when the drone went rogue. I would love to hear everyone's thoughts about this and how you would respond to the situation. I think I will call FFL and at least give them a heads up, that we have a known drone flyer in the area that can't control his toys. 1 Quote
aeroscout Posted October 1, 2013 Posted October 1, 2013 KC ARTCC has been notaming 2 to 3 drones operating in their area for days. Gotta keep the NSA busy. Quote
avbug Posted October 1, 2013 Posted October 1, 2013 Today, on a local forum, a resident posted a request for help from the community in locating and returning his lost, very expensive drone. The person stated that he lost it somewhere in the area of Staunton park while he was flying it over his neighborhood which is located on the eastern border of the park. He doesn't mention when he lost it, but that is not the point. The point is, he was flying an unknown sized drone, lost control of said drone which could have ended up anywhere. A private Predator? Hardly. Someone lost their RC toy. They're everywhere. They always have been. Get used to it. UAV's are another matter, and nobody has a private UAV/UAS/UCAV as a toy. 1 Quote
Black Bear Posted October 1, 2013 Author Posted October 1, 2013 I don't know what he was flying, and frankly I don't care. It was a hazard that, having lost control of it, could have had catastrophic results. The person is offering a reward for whoever finds it, which tells me that it was probably more than just your average RC helicopter. Toy or not, the point is to illustrate the potential dangers that we face as this industry grows and the amateurs take to the skies. Quote
Flying Pig Posted October 1, 2013 Posted October 1, 2013 My brother has one that has a 60 mile range. Cameras on it, downlink video feed, tail number, FAA registration...he has to keep his private pilot cert current to fly it, etc etc. Along with a trailer command post with monitors and controls. While it's not a Predator, it has an 8' wingspan and could definitely ruin someone's day if he were to ever lose control of it. Quote
adam32 Posted October 1, 2013 Posted October 1, 2013 KC ARTCC has been notaming 2 to 3 drones operating in their area for days. Gotta keep the NSA busy. We are safe now that the Gubermint shut down... Quote
apiaguy Posted October 1, 2013 Posted October 1, 2013 black bear... you sound like a NIMBY helicopter patrol man...You need a similar NIMBY soccer mom complaining about YOU flying your helicopter near her house to appreciate how you sound. Quote
SBuzzkill Posted October 4, 2013 Posted October 4, 2013 (edited) UAVs are not a big deal. I don't know why people are so scared of them... Edited October 4, 2013 by SBuzzkill Quote
Wally Posted October 4, 2013 Posted October 4, 2013 (edited) UAVs are not a big deal. I don't know why people are so scared of them... I've hit hundreds- if not thousands- of birds, bats, etc. Usually not a big deal, they're small, very light and lightly built organic, smeary material, even the power plants. And, they have nearly panaromic vision with a natural disinclination to being squashed like bugs.UAVs do not share any, or very many, of those traits. Especially the power plants and fuel cells. And, they're much much faster than birds. The engines would be projectiles through the aircraft if you encountered them head on. Suppose the considerable ones have traffic avoidance, video? Well, suppose they have much higher accident rate in much less busy airspace (4 times conventional piloted comparable airframes by one estimate) but that has been acceptable in the scenarios used... They are efficient assets when you measure the cost against recovering manned aircraft and crew in hostile scenarios. Is that the appropriate level of risk/benefit assessment for civil use?Suppose it is decided to allow LE, other government use only. How do you do that with general aviation presence? Well, you declare a TFR and use enforcement actions... I see the utility and advantage. But it's not an easy fix. Edited October 4, 2013 by Wally Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.