Tenacious T Posted September 14, 2010 Posted September 14, 2010 Do I need to sit on the left side to fly external loads? I notice some aircraft that are used for external loads are left seat PIC. I was told once that this was so that you didn't have to reach for the collective and it was right under your armpit. A 369A(OH-6A)is pretty small and is right seat PIC but I think I could lean out and still reach the collective ok, although I haven't tried it yet. I assumed I needed to fly it from the other side and just reach across to start, etc. I just read some study material though which talks about sitting right side. Does it matter? Quote
Eric Hunt Posted September 15, 2010 Posted September 15, 2010 Depends if you are doing short-line or long-line (vertical reference.) Short-line or belly tank with snorkel is usually done with a mirror through the chin bubble, so it doesn't matter which seat you use, within the FM limits. Vertical reference can be done from the RH seat of a B206, but the AS350 has a wider gap between the seat and the door, so it is not practical from the RHS. Some AS350 are set up with LH throttle controls and TQ meter. B212/412 have bubble windows with extra gauges in the door for left-seat vertical reference. Quote
apiaguy Posted September 15, 2010 Posted September 15, 2010 1st.. it doesn't matter.. it is personal preference2nd.. in the 369a i belive you're required to fly solo from the right seat only per the rfm. Quote
rick1128 Posted September 15, 2010 Posted September 15, 2010 I did a little longline training in a R44. While it was a reasonable reach to the collective, it still felt odd. Mostly due to the fact that your hold on the collect had changed. I also did a little in a BH47. It felt better, as my hold on the collective had not change it any great extent. I have run across a few 205's and 212's modified to allow the pilot to fly it from the left seat. That is why 500's are so popular for utility work, as the pilot flies from the left seat. The AStars use mirrors. I have tried it, but it really feels odd and takes some practice to do properly. Since you are spending most of your time watching the load, you are operating the helicopter mostly on sound, feel and instinct. At most you are giving the engine instruments just quick momentary glances. I found the 44 difficult to use in this regard. The engine instruments and markings are quite different. But then I don't have any appreciable amount of Robinson time. I found the 47 much easier to mentally capture the engine readings. It that regard, I have seen 500's that had aux warning lights mounted outside the airframe, just below the left pilot door. And engine instruments rotated on the instrument panel so that they could be read much easier by the pilot when his head is outside. Quote
Shaun Posted September 15, 2010 Posted September 15, 2010 Has no one tried using a camera system? It seems like you could have zoom features and display the gauges on the same screen. Quote
Trans Lift Posted September 15, 2010 Posted September 15, 2010 I use a mirror on the 44. It does take an hour or two to get used to. Once you get it down it's fine. Judging height from the ground with the load can be a little tricky at first too. There is another company near by that uses a camera system on their machines. Don't know it's advantages or disadvantages, I haven't seen it in use. Quote
adam32 Posted September 16, 2010 Posted September 16, 2010 Has no one tried using a camera system? It seems like you could have zoom features and display the gauges on the same screen. There's a company in Florida doing it with a camera and radar altimeter... Quote
Eric Hunt Posted September 16, 2010 Posted September 16, 2010 Cameras only show 2 dimensions - you need 3 dimensions for depth perception. Quote
Trans Lift Posted September 16, 2010 Posted September 16, 2010 Well you have to wear funny glasses but they have it in 3D now!! Quote
Shaun Posted September 16, 2010 Posted September 16, 2010 Cameras only show 2 dimensions - you need 3 dimensions for depth perception. From what I can find, and this agrees with what I was taught, the binocular aspects of depth perception only extend to about 20 feet, falling off the closer you get to 20. Quote
Tenacious T Posted September 17, 2010 Author Posted September 17, 2010 1st.. it doesn't matter.. it is personal preference2nd.. in the 369a i belive you're required to fly solo from the right seat only per the rfm. We use the military dash 10 manual, I double checked it but all I saw was that the right seat is refereed to as the pilot seat, nothing about limits on which seat to solo from. CG would not be a problem. I'm going to practice some VR in it before I put a line on, I'll try it from both sides. Quote
apiaguy Posted September 17, 2010 Posted September 17, 2010 the chief pilot of a local operator told me recently he "prefers" the right seat.. it's how he's done alot of VR and is most comfortable there.. if he can that's where he sits.. but it doesn't matter, what ever is most comfortable for you. Quote
500E Posted September 18, 2010 Posted September 18, 2010 Our 500c is left seat pic, not flown a 500 Right pic.No long L experiance but would think leaning out it is easier to use collective, rather than almost having to hang on leaning out of right door, still with a C18 how much can you lift Quote
Tenacious T Posted September 20, 2010 Author Posted September 20, 2010 Our 500c is left seat pic, not flown a 500 Right pic.No long L experiance but would think leaning out it is easier to use collective, rather than almost having to hang on leaning out of right door, still with a C18 how much can you lift Not much probably 700 lbs or so, we will probably use it for training mostly and maybe for slinging light loads of equipment for the power co. crews. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.