Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

This bird sports twin turbine engines for peace of mind. The FAA supposedly rated this "the safest helicopter it has ever certified". This bird can be optioned with sweet things like air-conditioning and even a privacy toilet on board. Very few production choppers have on-board lavs. And this is rather cool. Service ceiling is 14,000'. Range: 539 nmi. Cruise speed: 151 knots. Useful load? Well, can handle two German shepherds, a couple big Coleman coolers and some camping gear and two pilots to say the very least. I believe those huge wing stubs on the sides are fuel tanks and wells to hold the retractable main wheel gear.

 

A number of safety features such as flaw tolerance, bird strike capability, and engine burst containment have been incorporated into the design. Adherence to FAA FAR part 29 has led the FAA certification board to call the S-92 the "safest helicopter in the world". The S-92 reportedly met the FAR part 29 "run dry" requirement by asserting the loss of oil pressure in the main gear box is "extremely remote".

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sikorsky_S-92

SikorskiS-92Helicopter_zps6052081b.png

  • Like 1
Posted

The cons from what I heard are: strong vibrations and it's very very loud internally

Here is what Sikorsky says about that:

 

The S-92’s vibration control systems and cabin
acoustic enhancements provide a smooth ride and
quiet cabin.
If I were to order one, I would want the quietest-cabin package offered.
Posted

I'd rather have a S-61.

No longer produced. Was a lavatory an option in those?

Posted

Not really. I find its somewhat difficult to not poop when I'm flying sometimes :-)

 

Pretty hard to fly and poop at the same time...

That's what co-pilots are for. Perhaps, a pilot's passengers may need to take a dump.

Posted

 

That's what co-pilots are for. Perhaps, a pilot's passengers may need to take a dump.

But if I am going to pay $17 million for a bird, it had better have a crapper at that price.

Posted

All those extras equal extra weight...extra weight and mountains don't go together well..lighter the better.

Posted

All those extras equal extra weight...extra weight and mountains don't go together well..lighter the better.

The mountains of California don't exceed 14,500'. The majority of them don't exceed 10,000 feet.

 

The twin-engine S-92 has a service ceiling of 14,000 feet in Sikorsky's advertised literature. I should suspect that is fully fueled, optioned and laden.

Posted

Good aircraft, the engines are beast. It's service ceiling doesn't reflect how well it performs OGE at higher altitudes, which is really what you need for that mountain flying.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...