Jump to content

helicopter that crashed during bin laden raid


Recommended Posts

I was just about to ask the same. figured Goldy would come up with something with his infinite knowledge :) haha. I am stumped as to what it is

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am going to forecast Goldy's response:

 

"Plausible Deniablity".

 

-WATCH FOR THE PATTERNS, WATCH FOR THE WIRES-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love some of the comments below the post... :mellow: <_< :rolleyes:

 

Actually...there are helicopters out there now (since at least the early 90's actually) for the US military that are 100% quiet. They just a few feet from you and you wouldn't hear them.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wouldn't have bought any of this until a couple of months ago when what I believe was the CIA performed a practice raid on high rise near me (we are talking less than a block away) you can't tell me or any other rotor head that we can stand out and watch men fast-rope from a chopper just down the street that you could see and not hear AT ALL But that it exactly what I did, I don't believe that there is really anyway to tell for sure what happened over there, I originally was humored to hear one agency report that the entire extraction was done with "slightly modified UH-60 model helicopters" and that the low altitude drop was due to dust sucked back up into the turbine intakes and destroying the engine. What they didn't address was why a upgraded helo would fail from something a normal UH-60 would experience in the actual A.O.

 

More Pictures

Edited by Auto-Rotation-Nation
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well we all know the CIA has been making super quiet ships ever since the "highly modified" OH6's in Vietnam. And of course Whispermode has been out there since the early 80's as documented in my fav helo movie...BlueThunder. And you guys thought it was all Hollywood.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wouldn't be dust induction into the engine. I flew on Uh-60s for six years in the Army with two tours to the desert (yes, both deserts.) Those engines can ingest a lot of sand before they would even consider failing. Besides, each engine has what is called an "Inlet Particle Separator" unit which essentially takes a lot of (but not all) of foreign contaminants from the intake and blows it out a separate outtake nozzle at the back of the engine.

 

I became weary when I saw the first photo of the tail (the pic of the tail up against the wall) of said helicopter that crashed during the raid. It looks "kind of" like the tail end of an H-60, but there are certain things about it that don't look right. I've seen plenty of 160th Night Stalker blackhawk helicopters and know exactly what the tail booms and tail pylons look like (160th was the aviation unit that flew the SEALs in.) The crash site however looks comparable in size to some H-60 crash sites I've seen in the past, though I know they mentioned this one the crew blew up the aircraft upon extracting from the site of the raid. I'm not sure what is with the other phony photos of helicopter wreckage they have posted. Wouldn't surprise me though, already seen plenty of phony photos from this whole raid ordeal.

 

I do think the raid took place though, and I do think we killed Osama.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Except as far as I can tell, that picture was created yesterday afternoon in adobe photoshop CS4.

 

If IF they decided to make a quiet blackhawk, they wouldn't have made the blades go the other way AND put the tail rotor on the other side. Unless someone can tell me of some logic that makes it matter, for quiet's sake. (I could buy the tail rotor being on the other side of the rotor system, but not just reversing the whole thing).

 

Not to mention, the pictures don't jive up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The pictures released show the tail rotor on the right side, just like the Blackhawk. It looks like the sides are reversed because the horizontal stabilizers are swept forward. And I don't see anything photo-shopped (whether the components themselves are real remains to be seen).

 

Except as far as I can tell, that picture was created yesterday afternoon in adobe photoshop CS4.

 

If IF they decided to make a quiet blackhawk, they wouldn't have made the blades go the other way AND put the tail rotor on the other side. Unless someone can tell me of some logic that makes it matter, for quiet's sake. (I could buy the tail rotor being on the other side of the rotor system, but not just reversing the whole thing).

 

Not to mention, the pictures don't jive up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking more & more like a moded -60, like that's a surprise.

wreck.jpg

 

But this could be an interesting twist, especially if it was Comanche fallout -

mh-x3.jpg

 

This is my vote, tho...I might say it describes DEVGRU pretty good, 'cept you never actually get to see one. Unless it's right before they pull the trigger.

Blackout.jpg

 

-WATCH FOR THE PATTERNS, WATCH FOR THE WIRES-

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

"The Black Hawks were specially engineered to muffle the tail rotor and engine sound, two officials said. The added weight of the stealth technology meant cargo was calculated to the ounce, with weather factored in. The night of the mission, it was hotter than expected."

 

http://www.navytimes.com/news/2011/05/ap-raiders-knew-mission-a-one-shot-deal-051711/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...